![DecisionSkills](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 28
- 4 846 518
DecisionSkills
Приєднався 5 гру 2012
Focused on the science and philosophy of decision making, the channel is intended to cover a wide range of topics with an emphasis on decision tools with practical application. Videos delve into subjects such as goal-oriented decision making, naturalistic decision making, and rational decision making. This includes a mix of goal theory with decision research, including concepts such as cognitive bias, game theory, decision error, meta-decisions, and risk management. The scientific and philosophical foundations for the channel come from the fields of educational psychology, social cognitive theory, and to a lesser degree phenomenology.
Decision Making: Benefits and Limitations of Generative AI - ChatGPT
Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can help people make better decisions and it can be used to accelerate learning. However, just like any other tool, we need to use the right tool for the right job. The video discusses some of the benefits of artificial intelligence that is generative, as well as a few of the main limitations.
Переглядів: 3 404
Відео
Goal-Oriented Decision Making: The A.P.E. Model
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Рік тому
The APE model explores how we experience goal-oriented decision making. This includes the role of motivation and the experience of decision making in terms of how we assess, plan, and execute. The model also discusses how experience influences the use of intuition and deliberation. The foundations of the model as well as the concept of goal-oriented decision making, was derived from research on...
Naturalistic Decision Making: Accelerated Expertise
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
Discussing the difference between explicit and tacit knowledge, this video offers five suggestions for helping to accelerate your expertise. Based on research from educational psychology and naturalistic decision making, the video discusses guided exploration, using hypotheticals, case studies, simulations, and decision games.
Wicked Problems: A Naturalistic Approach
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
Wicked problems have no solutions and require a different approach than tame problems. While tame problems can be addressed using rational or scientific models, this is not the case for wicked problems. To better respond, research from naturalistic decision making is used to propose a naturalistic approach. The Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Conference coming up in late October. To check ou...
Careers in Decision-Making: Why Join the Naturalistic Decision Making Association (NDMA)
Переглядів 5312 роки тому
If you're interested in the art and science of decision-making, then consider joining the Naturalistic Decision Making Association. This video discusses career opportunities and the role of NDM practitioners in different industries. To learn more about NDMA, enroll in the free virtual open house being held April 25th, bit.ly/340cP8E For more info on joining the NDMA naturalisticdecisionmaking.o...
4-Phases for Achieving Goals: A Mindset Theory
Переглядів 1,6 тис.2 роки тому
Based on the work of Peter Gollwitzer, this video discuss the Mindset Theory of Action Phases. The theory proposes that we naturally shift from the mindsets of deliberation and implementation as we move through the 4-phases of achieving our goals. For additional resources: Mental contrasting ua-cam.com/video/pooG3-Whqys/v-deo.html Implementation Intentions ua-cam.com/video/mbGjJpkIsWM/v-deo.htm...
How to Create Tactical Decision Games: A 5-Minute Overview
Переглядів 2,4 тис.2 роки тому
A brief introduction to creating and playing tactical decision games (TDG's). Special credit to John Schmitt and his book Mastering Tactics. For a FREE copy bit.ly/3IdnMT8. Here is a link to a collection of TDG's. mca-marines.org/professional-development/tdg-collection/ For an article on how to use Naturalistic Decision Making when creating a TDG, you can read more here: bit.ly/35qjwRx
SMART Goals: "How to" in 60 seconds
Переглядів 8 тис.2 роки тому
A basic model for using SMART goals explained in 60 seconds. For a more in-depth explanation, you can enroll in a FREE, 30-minute course on Udemy with over 150,000 other students. www.udemy.com/goal-setting/
Intuitive Decision Making: The RPD Model in 60 seconds
Переглядів 15 тис.3 роки тому
A brief description of intuitive decision making using the recognition primed decision model (RPD). Developed by studying firefighters and chess players, the RPD model describes the role of experience in quickly recognizing a good course of action. Intuition also allows us to recognize when something is wrong, helping us to seek out more information.
The RPD Model: An Intro to Recognition Primed Decision Making
Переглядів 14 тис.3 роки тому
The recognition primed decision model or RPD model describes how people make decisions under real world conditions like time pressure and vague goals. Developed from the field of naturalistic decision making, the RPD model is often used to help increase performance and accelerate expertise. Note: there are several variations of the model. The version in this video is from Dr. Klein's article in...
Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM): A Contrast to Economic Models
Переглядів 1,9 тис.3 роки тому
In contrast to economic models of decision making that focus on microcognition, naturalistic decision making (NDM) focuses on macrocognition. Where economic models focus on error, NDM discovers how people make good decisions under real world conditions.
How Planning to Fail Leads to Success: The Basics of Using a PreMortem
Переглядів 22 тис.4 роки тому
The PreMortem is a cognitive tool developed by research psychologist Dr. Gary Klein. Using the tool during plan can help reduce errors created by overconfidence. Also referred to as Pre Mortem or Pre-Mortem, this tool came out of the Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) community.
The OODA Loop: A Competitive Decision-Making Tool
Переглядів 86 тис.5 років тому
Originally developed by Officer John Boyd for air combat, the OODA Loop is a competitive decision-making model that has been applied in business, sports, the military, and emergency management. Enroll in a FREE 30-minute course on using S.M.A.R.T. goals to achieve more in less time. www.udemy.com/goal-setting/
Reducing the Dunning Kruger Effect
Переглядів 75 тис.5 років тому
A form of cognitive bias, this video discusses several ways to reduce illusory superiority, most often called the Dunning-Kruger Effect. For a FREE course on setting SMART Goals; www.udemy.com/goal-setting/
A Modern Trolley Problem: Smart Cars and Ethical Programming
Переглядів 4,3 тис.7 років тому
As autonomous vehicles become a reality, how will they be programmed? How will your car resolve an ethical dilemma? This modern version of the trolley problem brings to life some thought-provoking questions about human nature and ethics. For a FREE course on setting SMART Goals; www.udemy.com/goal-setting/
The Planning Fallacy: Getting Things Done
Переглядів 25 тис.7 років тому
The Planning Fallacy: Getting Things Done
How to Use the 4 D's to Manage Your To-Do-List
Переглядів 10 тис.8 років тому
How to Use the 4 D's to Manage Your To-Do-List
How You Can Be More Decisive: A Cognitive Rampage
Переглядів 3,8 тис.8 років тому
How You Can Be More Decisive: A Cognitive Rampage
Social Reciprocity: The Science of Giving
Переглядів 44 тис.8 років тому
Social Reciprocity: The Science of Giving
5-steps to Create and Sustain Motivational Change
Переглядів 13 тис.8 років тому
5-steps to Create and Sustain Motivational Change
How Ice Cream Kills! Correlation vs. Causation
Переглядів 477 тис.8 років тому
How Ice Cream Kills! Correlation vs. Causation
The Need to Innovate: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
Переглядів 2,3 тис.9 років тому
The Need to Innovate: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
How to Solve a Problem in Four Steps: The IDEA Model
Переглядів 594 тис.9 років тому
How to Solve a Problem in Four Steps: The IDEA Model
00:09 SMART is an acronym to structure and evaluate goals. 00:37 Specific goals are easier to measure and achieve 01:00 Measurement of goals is crucial for determining success. 01:38 Importance of reliable weight measurement for SMART goals. 02:03 Break down main goal into manageable sub-goals 02:31 Setting SMART goals involves effort, value, and time constraints 03:04 Setting SMART goals helps in creating actionable plans. 03:29 Goal-setting is an ongoing process
Smart = effective
This was thrown out the window with Covid vaxx.
Is actionable your switch on the acronym or is that standard now? I found it more directive than achievable in a procedural perspective.
In 1981 the “a” was for assignable. George Doran offered assignable for managers in the original SMART model. Achievable is a common version, but there is no standard. Use what works for you. Some versions also add -er for SMARTER. Actionable helps to focus on practical steps to move towards the goal. Whether or not a goal is achievable is often unknown, especially if we are setting challenging goals.
Great explanation. Short and simple. Orient
Thanks.
Great work 👍
Thank you.
Thank you 😁
You're welcome!
Graduation Alliance linked this video in my Career Development course, and it is well needed! I learned so much and I most definitely will be passing this on to my children and many others!
Good explanation, thank you!
sir, the third one is actually achiveable and not actionable
Keep in mind there is not a single version of SMART. In the original, 1980’s version of SMART, the “a” was for assignable. There are versions with “a” as achievable and versions with “r” for realistic. There are also versions that are SMARTER. In the version presented here the “a” is presented as actionable for a very good reason. Many goals we may wish to pursue do not need to be achievable. We can take actions, we can develop an action plan that takes us towards a goal, but this does not signify a goal is known to be achievable. For example, running under a 4-minute mile was considered unachievable, yet it was actionable. It was unknown if sailing around the world in a wooden ship was achievable, but it was actionable. Today we don’t know if colonizing another planet is actually achievable or realistic. However, we can take actions towards discovering if it is achievable. We don’t know if time travel is achievable, but to this day some people take actions to discover this possibility. If you wish to use “a” for achievable, great. Or you might consider SMAART, where you include in your personal goals not only actions but whether or not you believe the goal is achievable. There is no established rule that SMART is limited to only a single version. Use whatever model works best for you.
Can someone tell me four courses of the issue
This is very useful
Thanks.
Multiply x2 + 10%
Fantastic. Can you donone on the CARVER matrix?
Thank you.
You're welcome!
❤❤
Amazing method of achieving our goals in a SMART way. Thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
It makes my brain hate me
This method had helped so many people.
ua-cam.com/video/ymrNXK-mSIw/v-deo.htmlsi=urPp4ESsbpvoWEwI
Was hungover
My goal is to watch this video. Because it's the smart thing to do. 🤓
youtube.com/@learnwithkarthik165?sub_confirmation=1
Thank you very much very well narrated 👏👏👏
Hi, i wanna ask. In active orientation, is a destination or goal must be spesific situation or condition, or can it just be principle? I mean, sometimes i don't know how the end, may you explain this to me?
It can be general. Our observations may not allow us to determine a specific goal or precise destination. It can be unclear or foggy. As we navigate through the fog we continue to observe, we learn, we gain more information, and this may require that we reorient. It is important to understand that our ability to observe can become better or worse as conditions change. We may have a clear goal in one moment and then find ourselves in the dark and disoriented. It is an ongoing process.
Although short but very insightful, my take home point is the use of IDEA to solve complex problem. Thank you
Om shanti
I loved it!!! Sooo helpful, thank you! I subscribed to the page :)
I remember they showed us this in 8th grade. When I was in 8th grade I was slightly overweight so it was uncomfortable watch the obesity part lmao
this work at a pizza place ass music lmaooooo
I think that taking diarhia medicinemakes me more smarter.
My college class “Foundations of Computer Science” sent me here. .. Yay! I’m so happy to be in a class worth taking!! 📝😁🎉
Climate change catastrophists and disaster junkies need to watch this.
Thank you ❤
While I love this video and it is extremely helpful, I really wish the main example wasn't about weight loss. It's awkward to share this video to others because of that.
FANTSASTIC ! WELL DONE BUT NEEED TO FOCUS ON SMART NOT THE IDIOT 40 /,60 CONFUSING RUBBISH. HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SMART.
Goal setting is so important. What goals have you set for yourselves?
I learned OODA Strategy from the book Buddha Badass. Applying it to my driving skills too ❤
I like dunning . He makes life easy to understand.
The best, most practical and realistic explanation, I've seen so far. Thanks!!!
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much for thissss
Nice
Any other Gs out here from TRW……? 🤫
What a boring video
Where can I find this magazine of solutions?
Here is a link that is a collection of the TDG's mca-marines.org/professional-development/tdg-collection/
@@DecisionSkills thanks, but do you know about the solutions
thanks man i want to be a tactical genius, good video 🫡
Great video ! Remind me of S.M.A.R.T goals with a “diffuse mode thinking” added / MindMap..
I am grateful for this
What is the goal vs passing time over it? Does it come from profesionailism or from ur own brain comepetncy?
"Orient" is still causing me some confusion... If orient is active, then it involves some Action, thus requiring a Decision. If so, then I'd argue that "Active Orientation" is primary to Observation... For example, sitting with a good view of a room and access to cover and exits - or positioning yourself to receive earlier indication, or more complete, information. So, to be an effective observer you must first exist in a "Orient->Observe" loop, which becomes your base behaviour. If a potential threat is identified, it becomes an "Orient->Observe->Decide" loop as you position more reactively, for view and opportunity - at this point, your Decisions seek to position yourself to act. At the point of engagement, it becomes an "Orient->Observe->Decide->Act" loop. And, Action _(since you should already have the initiative)_ will generally dictate its own reflexive reorientation to maintain safety and permit continued situational awareness till the threat is gone. But then, the video shows something different... Orient is shown as a more passive, mental step.... In the example given, the Orient phase identified 4 options "Dive, Climb, turn or run" ... this seems to indicate that you're not orienting in space, but in mind. Orienting in space _(in the example)_ comes two stages later. If Orient is passive, then sure, it's a precursor to Deciding - but becomes more akin to Analyse or Integrate. *I imagine the "shoot/move" dynamic :* If you're properly Oriented and aware prior to the 'Shoot', then the ''Move' decision and direction is already settled. Shoot and (Re)Position is a single atomic Act : But the cycle begins BEFORE there's a threat... A) Pre threat - "Active awareness drill" : (Orient, Observe) loop. You cannot observe effectively without continuous orientation, so, effective observation is necessarily active. Here you're dancing with the environment. B) Potential Threat identified - 'Active pre-engagement cycle' (Orient, Observe, Decide) loop. Here we're in a three-way dance with the potential threats AND the environment. This is more dynamic, so we're leveraging on initiative. C) Engagement - "Act quickly and decisively" (Act + Re-Orient) as a single pre-decided Act! Reorientation is reflexive to the Action... our Threats are expected to react to the Act, not the Reorientation. So, we attempt to keep initiative and ensure that we don't let the Action leave us out of position or narrow down our situational awareness. D) Having re-oriented, We're either back to B cycle .. or relaxing posture into A cycle. E) If you get here, you made it home. Feet up, Netflix, Beer and chill. You likely have a dog, an alarm system, and warnings come early. ; ) I'm probably missing something important. I'm just Not sure I understand the OODA loop as an explanatory mechanism. I think the most essential thing you can do is drill on adrenaline management, by repeatedly doing both dynamic cerebral tasks and fine coordination tasks under REAL pressure. Ultimately, you can have all the fancy acronyms in the world - but when adrenaline hits, you'll find yourself in someone else's body. You're coping with blood flow restrictions, Lizard-brain, and fine-motor issues... so, you really need to drill on anxiety and truly get to know your body's autonomous responses.
OODA is only a model. Like any model, it is merely a representation. It promotes discussion. There is an advanced OODA Loop that goes more in depth, but it is also just a model. Consider, you are always oriented in some direction. You are also always observing. So there is no “if orient is active” as there is no point in time in which you are not in a particular orientation. Even as you sleep, you are oriented in some direction (head on your pillow) and your senses are observing, albeit passively. If there is a loud noise, a decision is made regarding the noise (is it a threat) and you act by either ignoring the noise, or you attend to the noise by beginning to reorient (lifting your head from the pillow). The loop is ongoing, and many of the decisions we make and actions we take can happen intuitively with little deliberation.